Six events that got us talking about nonprofits in 2010

Is it just me or were more people talking a lot about nonprofits this year? Not just from my fellow nonprofiteers; but also from folks who were interested in doing good or who were shocked/interested by some stuff they heard and wanted to learn more.

I decided to compile some events this year that I think made those of us working in the nonprofit sector think more critically about our work as well encouraged others to participate (or at least learn about) our role in this country.

The Earthquake in Haiti

Boy survive earthquake Haiti

From helphaitiearthquakevictims.com/

What happened: On Tuesday January 12th a catastrophic 7.0 magnitude earthquake hit Haiti a few miles outside of the capital Port-au-Prince. The earthquake killed 230,000 people, injured 300,000, and left 1,000,000 homeless. The limited infrastructure Haiti had was severely damaged, making recovery efforts difficult.

How did this affect nonprofits? In addition to mobilizing communities to participate in relief efforts in a variety of ways, several organizations stole the spotlight because of their use of technology (good) and their questionable actions in times of crisis (bad).

The Red Cross made text message donations more mainstream and raised the most of any disaster relief organization responding to the earthquake; at the same time they, along with Wyclef Jean’s nonprofit Yele Haiti, faced harsh criticism for their handling of funds. By February, over $500 million raised for Haiti had not been spent leading many to question nonprofits ability to respond to disaster.

BP Oil Spill

BP oil spill water image

From thegrio.com/news/bp-oil-spill-leaves-local-black-businesses-in-the-muck.php

What happened: On April 20th, a deepwater drilling rig operated by British Petroleum exploded releasing 4.9 million barrels of oil into the the Gulf of Mexico over three months. The damage to marine and wildlife habitat and the fishing and tourism industries is still being felt: over 6,800 dead animals, one third of the gulf closed for fishing, and an estimated $23 billion will be lost in tourism revenue over the next three years.

How did this affect nonprofits? While many nonprofits helped with relief and clean up efforts, the news was full of stories analyzing the troubling and often precarious relationship between nonprofits and their corporate sponsors.

The Aquarium of the Pacific in California, who had received large donations from BP, wondered whether or not they should actively disassociate themselves from the corporation. The Gulf of Mexico Foundation, a conservation nonprofit in Texas, claimed the damage on the coast had been overblown. A little investigation revealed that at least half of the 19 members of the group’s board of directors have direct ties to the offshore drilling industry. Indeed this “advocacy-for-hire” trend–where the line between corporate and nonprofit interests are blurred to advance a corporation’s interest–was exposed, demonstrating that the word “nonprofit” is really just a word.

Interestingly enough, in the response to the earthquake and oil spill I also saw lots of individuals taking matters into their own hands as volunteers and fundraisers without working with nonprofits or working with small local organizations over large ones. Again-free agents on the move.

The Giving Pledge

Bill Gates Warren Buffet Giving Pledge

From rationalwalk.com/?p=9090

What happened: Bill Gates and Warren Buffet started a campaign to encourage the wealthiest people in the United States to give most of their money to charity. As of this month 57 billionaires have joined and pledged to give away 50% or more of their wealth.

How did this affect nonprofits? While it didn’t have an immediate impact on nonprofits, it got people talking about giving: why does it matter? how do we determine who to give to? what’s affective? and, oddly enough, is this ethical?

Many people who have signed the pledge are notorious for wanting to have a significant hand in whatever cause they support. Eli Broad, for example, has emerged as a major player in education and the relationships that Michelle Rhee developed with foundations during her time as education chancellor in DC have been criticized. Similar to the concern of “advocacy for hire” is this another way for billionaires to have more power under the mask of a nonprofit? Will the growth in their donations result in an unfair growth in their power in our democracy?

And the need for better philanthropy goes beyond money: who will lead philanthropic efforts to ensure that we achieve social justice instead of intensifying inequality with a sudden source of funds?  The issue isn’t just money-it’s what we do with it.

New tax requirement for nonprofits by the IRS

IRS logo

From ehow.com/videos-on_8224_surviving-irs-tax-audit.html

What happened: In 2006, the IRS wanted to know whether small nonprofits (making less than $25,000) were still in business so they required these nonprofits to file tax returns for 2007, 2008, and 2009 by May 15, 2010.

How did this affect nonprofits? Apparently these small nonprofits didn’t get the memo. More than 300,000 nonprofits risked losing their 501c3 status, even though the IRS ultimately extended the deadline to October. The IRS will reveal who lost their 501c3 status in January, however the chaos revealed many aspects of small nonprofits that often go undiscussed by folks in and out of the nonprofit sector: just how challenging it is to reach small nonprofits; how difficult it is for them to meet such requirements; and how many of them go out of business.

Jumo

Jumo nonprofit

From jumo.com

What happened: Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes launched Jumo, a social network solely for nonprofits and their supporters.

How did this affect nonprofits? Like any social network conversations focused on its utility: another network to worry about? is our audience there? how can this be used to advance my cause? Again, the pressing social media for social good question emerged: will a focus on nonprofits make it easier for followers/fans to translate into donors or volunteers? Stories abound of successful nonprofits managed to leverage social media for more resources and other websites like Facebook make it easier to connect with supporters and already have strong followings. At the same time for those not already connected with nonprofits Jumo may be a great place to start because of its focus and ease. The site just launched in November so its impact remains to be seen.

White House Council for Community Solutions

Obama White House Council Community

From: serve.gov/council_home.asp

What happened: On December 14th, President Obama established the White House Council for Community Solutions will provide advice to the President on the best ways to mobilize citizens, nonprofits, businesses and government to work more effectively together to solve specific community needs.

How did this affect nonprofits? This is the second large government initiative that works directly with nonprofits. The first, the Social Innovation Fund launched in 2009, which gave its first round of awards this year. The council is unique in that is is a standing group. The council itself is composed of a diverse group of leaders from different sectors including Diane Aviv, CEO of the Independent Sector and Bon Jovi. Given how recent this is, the impact has yet to be seen. However, is this a sign of more government and nonprofit partnerships? Such relationships are not always clear cut and for many this is a sign of government trying to have more control in business and nonprofits.

These events will be on my mind next year as nonprofits will certainly face new challenges and address the ongoing impact of old ones.  What events got you talking about nonprofits?


10 Qualities of Outstanding Nonprofit Employees

Ok, let me get this out before I even begin: I think Bill Sommerville, President and Founder of Philanthropic Ventures Foundation, is one of the smartest and most compelling leaders in this space.  His approach to giving and leadership demonstrate a commitment to creating a clearer vision for foundations when it comes to bringing about social justice.

And his book, Grassroots Philanthropy, which challenges foundations to do more and give more, is awesome.  I read it back in April after hearing him speak at the Emerging Practitioners in Philanthropy Conference in Denver.  Recently I was revisiting some old texts that left a mark on me this year–in preparation for writing out my goals for the new year–and his seven qualities of outstanding nonprofit employees stood out to me (they are taped on my office wall for inspiration) so I just had to share.

  • Humor: Outstanding people balance their seriousness about work with an ability to laugh at almost anything–including themselves.
  • Ambition: Outstanding people burn with an unquenchable longing to make good things happen.
  • Optimism: Outstanding people view seemingly hopeless situations as issues waiting to be resolved.
  • Vision: Outstanding people recognize possibilities that remain hazy, opaque, or invisible to others.
  • Realism: Outstanding people maintain a sense of proportion, concentrating on the work at hand rather than inflated daydreams.
  • Instinct: Outstanding people learn to trust the good sense of their gut feelings and intuition.
  • Consistency: Outstanding people stick it out for the long haul–which can mean years, decades, or even the course of an entire lifetime.

Outstanding people aren’t just good for advancing an organization’s mission; they also invigorate and inspire the people around them creating communities of people who care.

I would add the following:

Openness: Outstanding people are aware that others come to a cause with various perspectives and welcome those voices.
Proactive: Outstanding people don’t hesitate to lend a hand or take action when needed.
Awareness: Outstanding people are insatiable learners about their cause, their community, and themselves.

What qualities do you think nonprofit employees should have?

Photo credit


Philanthropy and Politics–A Complicated Mix?

There has been a great deal of  conversation on education reform in DC now that Mayor Fenty is gone and his school chancellor, Michelle Rhee, is likely to follow suit.  People have been examining the impact her tenure has had on education in DC and what has come under scrutiny is her relationship with foundations.  Teacher Ken of Daily Kos writes:

When she sought outside foundation money, it originally came with strings –  that if Rhee did not continue as head of the schools the foundations would not be obligated to meet the financial commitment they were offering.  Whether or not one agrees with Rhee’s ideas for the school system, such conditions should be unacceptable –  foundations have a choice either to commit funds or not to commit them, but they should not be allowed to dictate personnel decisions in the public sector merely because they have more money than the people served by that public sector.

Unfortunately, this is symptomatic of much of what we have seen from what Diane Ravitch has dubbed “the Billionaire Boys Club” of the likes of the foundations of Eli Broad, Bill and Melinda Gates (who have a number of former key members of their foundation at the top levels of the U. S. Department of Education under Duncan), The Walton Family, and others.

When I attended the Emerging Practioners in Philanthropy conference in April, there was a push for foundations to engage in social justice work and advocate for systemic changes that will better help the people many non-profits serve.  At the same time,  I wonder if the kind of relationship Gates, Broad, and Walton are creating with politicians is the kind of relationship we envision when it comes to promoting social justice.

Firstly, only certain foundations have this kind of pull. In other words,  I’m pretty sure it isnt just the money from the foundations that is attractive; it’s also the people behind the money.  These are all powerful people who have a great deal of influence.  As a result, this doesn’t come off as collaboration, where organizations that serve a similar population in a similar issue discuss ways to combine resources and efforts. Instead there is mounting resentment from teachers, parents, and communities about what they feel is happening to them instead of with them.

Secondly, should funding be attached to people in the first place?
Politics are inherently  messy and if there is one things I took away from the primaries is that reform efforts are volatile. Once a candidate leaves, often the policies they created go with them.  Funding may influence the continuation of a person’s power that may be unwelcomed, where as programs can have new leaders or change direction when necessary.

And finally, are we setting up a situation where voices of other foundations will be drowned out of this conversation?
Not just because they may not have the  money and influence of Gates Foundation, for example, but also because the way in which the conversation is being shaped requires a certain approach that other foundations may not agree with.  Can lasting change only come from working with politicians?  What role does the community play in this approach?

What do you think about the current role of foundations in politics?  Are there other examples of this kind of relationship?


Stopping Unemployment in Rural Ohio and Starting a Movement for Rural America

A few months ago I attended the DoSomething.org awards show at the Apollo and was surprised to learn that Mark Rembert, a fellow graduate of my alma mater Haverford College, was a finalist for a $100,000 grant for his organization Energize Clinton County (If you like him, go vote for him!).  Energize Clinton County is a nonprofit that seeks to strengthen Clinton County, a small town in a rural part of Ohio that was devastated by the closure of the town’s largest employer.  I was excited when Mark offered to share his thoughts and experiences on social change, philanthropy, and supporting rural towns and found the interview to be incredibly rewarding.

Tell us about yourself:

As a person who loves places, its nearly impossible for to talk about who I am without talking about where I am. I am proud to say I live in my hometown of Wilmington, a small rural town in southwest Ohio. As a kid, Wilmington was a pretty ideal small town to grow up in. It provided a quiet and peaceful environment, I had good friends, I had fruitful experiences in school, and I generally enjoyed life. But after I graduated from Wilmington High School in 2003, I did what I was supposed to do: I left. I ended up leaving the mid-West for the East Coast, and spent about six years in and around Philadelphia attending Haverford College and living in West Philadelphia. I loved Philadelphia and learned a great deal and community and place while living there. But I ended up deciding that I want to try out a new place, so I enrolled in the Peace Corps to expand upon the training in economics that I had received at Haverford.

As I was awaiting to ship off to Ecuador to begin my service, I was drawn home by a crisis that had struck Wilmington. In May of 2008, DHL Express announced that it would be closing its US overnight shipping hub at the Wilmington Air Park, laying off the 8,000 people employed at the Wilmington facility. Realizing the magnitude of the economic shock of this decision, I decided to spend my time waiting to leave for the Peace Corps in Wilmington. I came home knowing that the town I would come back to after the Peace Corps would be completely different the town I grew up in. Within just a few weeks of returning home in August 2008, I began to realize that my calling to serve was not in Ecuador, it was in my own hometown.

Tell us about Energize Clinton County

Energize Clinton County is a non-profit community economic development organization that I co-founded with my childhood friend Taylor Stuckert. We have a pretty simple mission: we want to make our hometown a vibrant place in the world again, and we want to demonstrate a new vision of possibility for small towns and rural places across America. Working in a small town setting, we’ve adopted an approach which acknowledges the uniqueness of any community and works to strengthen the rootedness of communities.

Our efforts to facilitate change begin with assisting community organizations, institutions, or individuals to clearly visualize new opportunities through planning and design. As projects move from planning to action, we provide support in assembling the tools, knowledge, and resources required for bringing about sustainable changes that improve the economic, social, and environmental life in our community.

What motivated you to start this organization?

Although our community’s economic crisis played a major role in bringing Taylor and I home, we did not set out to create 8,000 jobs to replace those lost at the Air Park. Instead, we were inspired to get involved by the energy and creativity of our friends and neighbors that wanted to fight to preserve their home by inventing the community from the ground up with new ideas. We were particularly motivated by a problem that many of people who were excited and ready to get to work rebuilding the community lacked a way visualize and communicate their ideas so that action and resources could mobilize behind seizing new opportunities. With our backgrounds in communications and international development, we felt like we had an opportunity to provide some the tools needed by the community to realize a new vision for its future, and move it towards achieving its goals.

We are also motivated by a pressing need in our country to reinvent rural America. For decades, rural places have dealt with chronic economic and social challenges, and as a result continue to lose population and decline. Yet, we still hold the belief that small towns and rural places are not only important to preserve, but that in doing so they will be capable of greatly contributing to the new innovations and ideas that will help drive the country through the 21st Century.

What do you find most rewarding about your work?

Without a doubt, the best thing about doing the work we do in our own community is that we are the direct beneficiaries of our own successes. Service is so often framed in terms of sacrifice, or about the good feeling you get for helping other people. But for us, we’re actually the direct recipients of our work, which is pretty great. As the community improves, it actually improves the quality of our own daily lives.

Another especially rewarding aspect of our work is the creative opportunity it provides. There are no instruction manuals for revitalizing small towns, and when resources are scarce there is an every great demand on the creative design process. There is a lot of excitement around feeling like we are on the frontier of developing innovative solutions that can benefit small towns across the country.

What do you find most challenging? How do you work around those challenges?

One of our greatest challenges is overcoming the stereotypes of small towns. Having both lived on the East Coast for extended periods, we are keenly aware of the perceptions that small towns are backward, boring, culture-less places, where uneducated, non-worldly people live. If as a country we’re going to seriously work to revitalize rural areas, we have to first dispel the myth that places that attract people looking for a more humble, community focused lifestyle lack creativity, innovation, or a desirable quality life. We have experienced the exact opposite, and value greatly the innovation that we have seen take from and grow very quickly in tight-knit communities that are experienced in working together.

We are also greatly concerned by what we see as a systematic failure in addressing the serious economic and social challenges of rural areas.

Rural places are home 19 percent of the population, and 20 percent of America’s poor, yet rural places receive less than 7% of all grants distributed by the top 1,000 U.S. Foundations, less than 2% of all philanthropic grants made by Fortune 500 companies, and receive between $401 and $648 less per capita in Federal government funding than urban areas. Even more worrisome are policies that address rural poverty by moving the rural poor to urban areas instead of investing in small towns and providing them with tools to address poverty locally through community economic development.

If we are to preserve our country’s small towns and rural places, and address the serious social, economic, and health crises facing our rural communities, we must begin to change our perception, and begin re-investing in rural America.

What advice or resources do you have for young people wanting to launch social change organizations?

In our experience, the easiest way to create lasting change is to do it in your own community. When we started ECC, we did so with little experience in community development, and almost zero resources, so our success has not been the result of years of experience, or a wealth of resources at our disposal. The change we’ve created has been the result of our ability to mobilize our friends, families, and neighbors to make changes in the they live, work, and spend money in our community.

We encourage young people to look for inspiration in the things that make your community special: history, local culture and traditions, the natural landscape and environment, unique local businesses, or the power of neighbors coming together to make their community better. Tapping into the energy, experience, and knowledge of your community is the best starting point for getting an idea of the ground.

How can people support you or get involved?

We’re working to expanding our efforts to surrounding small towns in our region, and are always looking for resources to assist us in that effort. We’re currently raising $6,000 to hire a Co-Op from the planning department at University of Cincinnati for the fall quarter to assist in our community economic development planning efforts. If you would like to donate, you can do so here: http://bit.ly/donate-ecc

We’re also always looking for new ideas. If you live in a small town tell us about why you love it, and share your stories about innovative efforts that have improved the quality of life in your community.

The most important thing rural communities and small towns can do is share ideas, experiences, and what works. If you’re trying to get new ideas off the ground in your community, let us know how we can help.

You can share your ideas with us by e-mailing mytown@energizecc.com.


Recap #ynpchat: The Importance of Board Service for Young Nonprofit Professionals

On Wednesday Rosetta Thurman and I hosted our fourth twitter chat for young nonprofit professionals, with YNPN-DC as a special cohost!  The topic was board service: why it is beneficial and how young nonprofit professionals can find board positions. Once again it was fast paced conversation with lots of great information and stories being shared.  Here are a couple of responses to the questions:

Q1: Have you considered joining a board?  Why/Why not?

@KristenEJ: I think board service is a great way to give back, but getting on boards can be intimidating sometimes
@eglouise: Absolutely. I currently serve on the board of a professional group and would love to serve a local nonprofit as well
@dan_blakemore: I have considered it, mostly to share my #fundraising knowledge with other orgs
@ynpndc: Key reasons may be – bd svc seems inaccessible, young leaders feel unqualified, they are not sure what is involved in bd svc

Q2: How can board service be beneficial to your professional and personal growth?

@CrookdRiverWmn Being board member makes you a better staffperson & vice versa. Learn finance, governance, leadership skills
@rosettathurman: Board service allowed me to learn how to build consensus among differing viewpoints/worldviews – really tough, but rewarding.
@3manypuppies: Board service is a great way to lead projects when you might not be high enough in the hierarchy to do it at your day job
@gassnerotting: Where do I begin? As a nonprofit executive recruiter, board service is one of the first things I seek in young professionals
@gassnerotting: Board service imparts wisdom, leadership, broader network, advanced skills, & demonstrates hunger, ambition, mission dedication
@3manypuppies: Board service is a great way to lead projects when you might not be high enough in the hierarchy to do it at your day job
@eglouise: Boards give opportunity to work w/ new people & encounter new ideas. They can also get you out of your orgs silo.

Q3: Why is it important to have young voices on a board?

@iaagustin: One more important thing is that younger nonprofit professionals today have drive, energy & enthusiasm
@youthseeksjob: As a voice thats young & new, im not embroiled in politics yet – helps others regain perspective
@rosettathurman: Young #nonprofit professionals in particular, have on-the-ground knowledge that board members from business world don’t have.
@Maria_G: Board I’m on has gen. diversity written into bylaws i.e. a 50+ member. This leads to great conversations & dif. perspectives

Q4: What are some important characteristics to look for when joining a board?

@CrookdRiverWmn: The best boards are active and work. Some get stuck in debating resolutions & shirk governance. Find a working board! Gah!
@jessica_journey: If its your first board, see if another board member is willing to mentor you!

@ajlovesya: I like boards that engage the community they serve & participate in orgs events. That’s why I love the board I serve

@coien: From past experience, I’ve learned that I’ll have a hard time with a board that’s way more talk than action. @youthseeksjob: t’s about a good fit: reciprocal needs (win/win), respect, openness to ideas – and some shared basic values.

@snotforprofit: It’s important to know your legal responsibilities if you sit on a charitable board – there are ramifications.

@snotforprofit: Don’t sit on a board if you aren’t willing to fundraise — Don’t be THAT board member.

That last tweet sparked a wonderful conversation on the role of fundraising in being a board member.  Given the importance and responsibility of raising money for an organization, how can young nonprofit professionals who dont have fundraising experience or access to money “give or get?”  Participants had some great tips to keep in mind:

@CrookdRiverWmn: Remember that most boards are for small organizations. Big orgs with fancy fundraising balls & corporate contacts are minority.
@gtak: Board service – no fundraising experience & limited disposable income – offer to help research and write a grant proposal
@iaagustin: There’s more to a board than fundraising. Expertise in cause (ie stats & issues) & connections (new collaborations) r imp as well

I’ve written a longer response to this question with some more suggestions.

Q5:  How do you find out about board service opportunities?

@gassnerotting Dont be too shy to call the org whose board you want to serve. Its like manna from heaven for overworked ED

@thefriendraiser: seek out local leadership programs that train for service. we have a few in #CLT // I did this one http://bit.ly/9BNtkF

@snotforprofit: Canadians wanting to join a NFP board? Try http://www.altruvest.org formerly Board Match.

@ynpndc: Bridgestar also has board postings. http://www.bridgestar.org/Home.aspx

I also recommend BoardNetUSA and your local Young Nonprofit Professionals Network (YNPN) chapter.  In fact, YNPN-DC and YNPN-NYC are looking for board members!

If you couldn’t join the chat, check out the conversation by doing a twitter search. If you want answers to specific questions include A1, A2, etc in your twitter search with #ynpchat. Stay tuned for our next twitter chat July 7th at 12pm EST!