From Giver to Securer of Resources: My First Impressions of Fundraising

Before taking my current position as director of development, much of my experience in the non-profit sector was as an educator–working directly with young people in disadvantaged neighborhoods. It was fulfilling and challenging but my experiences ultimately led me to development. Now, I have a larger view of the organization and the issues affecting it and I can get more support (monetary and otherwise) for resources that young people that need it.

My experiences as an educator have some what prepared me for the shift in the sense that I am more aware of what kinds of programs work, what kinds of environments are best, and how to get students and parents to be more excited about learning. So when looking for money and other resources, I think in terms of what will be most beneficial for the students.

What has been most difficult in moving from giver of resources to securer of resources is the shift in perspective of the students. From my personal experiences being one of those underserved-inner-city- youths to my professional experiences as an educator, I learned to work with kids keeping what they DID have in mind and working with them to make them stronger students. As a fundraiser I often feel as though I am emphasizing what they DONT have, their joys and successes followed by how unfortunate their circumstances are and how needy they are. The kids dont see themselves as poor, but thats often what I am talking about.

Of course I was never naive about what students may be experiencing, but kids dont want to talk about how difficult their lives were. They want to talk about meeting other kids, learning, going on field trips, being leaders, and looking good. Maybe as I spend more time in the field, I'll see there's more than just pimping misery.

Essentially, there is a disconnect that I have to further explore and reconcile. I would love to hear the experiences of other people in fundraising–have you dealt with this? Am I exaggerating or totally off? How do you go about setting standards of dedication to the larger cause of inequality while not portraying the people affected as lacking agency?